This response is worth a post.
-----Original Message-----
From: Reis
Sent: Saturday, April 29, 2006 9:18 PM
To: Opie
Subject: ford tempo - a collector's item
Today driving through Wisconsin I was confronted with a Ford Tempo – the same body style as the one you had in high school. It had collector’s plates. It was in the same condition it probably was in when it left the factory. This begs a few obvious questions.
1) Are we now so old that cars we owned in high school are eligible for collector plates?
2) In the name of all that is good, who would collect a Ford Tempo?
3) Why would you lovingly preserve a Tempo?
Any thoughts on these sacred mysteries, please feel free to write back.
I’m telling you, the thing was immaculate. It’s like someone purchased it, put in a garage, ran the engine once in a while, and that’s it until today.
Reis.
-----Original Message-----
From: Opie
Sent: Saturday, May 1, 2006 7:10 PM
To: Reis
Subject: Re: ford tempo - a collector's item
Reis,
Being a former owner of one of these automotive beasts, I feel that I can share from my personal experiences with this vehicle. I will respond in a point by point fashion to your questions, with the possibility of adding sub-lists to the over arching point by point structure. I will also use questionable grammar. Whether this a volitional literary choice or simply an out-working of my grammatical ignorance, I will leave for you to decide.
1) Are we now so old that cars we owned in high school are eligible for collector plates?
The Wisconsin rules for collector plates require that the vehicles be >= 20 years old (please note that >= means greater than or equal to and not a sad emoticon, nor half a de-decapitated man (or woman) laying on his back [or front {but it is definitely not a decapitated woman laying on her back because that would look like this >=3}] ) and my Tempo was made in 1987. I know that the '86 model was very similar to the '87. In fact, the Tempo did not undergo a major redesign until the early 1990's. So, to answer you concisely, yes Reis, you are old. To answer less concisely, yes, the cold hand of time is perpetually dragging you mercilessly to states of ever greater decay until your inevitable demise. Deal with it. While your at it, you might want to deal with any nasal hair issues you have.
2) In the name of all that is good, who would collect a Ford Tempo?
I think that the allure of the Tempo is rooted in Ford's refusal to compromise on either the performance or styling of the vehicle at any point. As a result, the consumer did not have to decide whether to sacrifice power for fuel economy nor styling for safety because it had none of the above. Since capitulation is easier than optimization, the Tempo was left to embody systematic sub-par design--the complete crap package as it were. To improve any individual part of the car would only serve to highlight deficiencies in all other aspects of the design defeating the marketing strategy "Blinded by Mediocrity". An idiocy whose time had come. Spurred by fear of Japanese economic dominance, as demonstrated by such popular movies as "Gung Ho", Americans thought it was their patriotic duty to purchase large, clearly inferior products, and the Tempo fit the bill. After purchase, the immediate predictable yet uncontrollable deterioration of the vehicle with use resulted in the development of unique "features"--in addition to amenities such as passenger accessible windshield wiper control. My car had such "features" as the inability to complete a left-hand turn without stalling on days with greater than 75% relative humidity, the ability to burn oil/oil additives at rates comparable to modern refineries, and what I like to term the specialty "rust package". As each owner learned how to overcome these ever developing life-threatening tendencies, like randomly staling at speeds greater than 55 mph, in their particular car, they would start a vicious cycle. The car would deteriorate to the point that only one person would know all the peculiarities to drive it semi-safely. So the owner could not sell it out of fear of prosecution for negligence, yet could not afford to buy another car. This is the mechanism of forced pair bonding with the Tempo. So Chris, what you witnessed was not the relationship between an object and a collector, but the outworking of a intricate, natural, long-standing relationship based on fear and respect between a man and his car. A relationship that, despite its loving nature, will never be legally recognized, and which will never be allowed to adopt children, which is probably best considering the obvious safety issued raised above.
3) Why would you lovingly preserve a Tempo?
Insanity. Stay away from these people. They are dangerous deviant degenerates. Your only advantage in confronting these people is that tetanus induced lock-jaw from rust-filled regular maintance prevents them from being able to bite. (Side note: This is why Tempos are amongst the lowest rated vehicles in Vampire Consumer Reports and Automotive Zombie Weekly.)
Opie